MacBook Pro 15” pushing 25+ millions pixels with dual 4K

I have to admit I have never before changed my setup so often as during the past 12 months or so. Due to The Curse of Retina however it was again time for some changes: I replaced my two 27” Dell monitors (U2713H and U2713HM) and the DELL U2414 portrait off-screen with two 28” Philips Brilliance 288P 4K ones and it has been a great improvement.

HomeOffice_MBP15-2013_Dual4Kdriving22Kpixels

The MacBook Pro 15” Retina (late 2013) with GeForce 750M can drive both 4k displays in addition to its build-in display. Running both 4K screens in their native resolution of 3840×2160 and the build-in display at 2880×1800 (which I actually often do) totals an insane 21.7 million pixels of screen real-estate.

This allows me to open all the large documents and spreadsheets I work on and multiple browser windows with tons of tabs in each and keep it all visible while having room to spare.

In this configuration you have one of the two Thunderbolt ports free. You can push those 22.7 million pixels to an staggering almost 25+ million pixels by attaching a 27” or 30” screen running at 2560×1440 or 2560×1600 respectively! It did it for a couple of days, but I dislike the lack of crispness on the normal screen compared to the 4K screens and the build-in display.

While the left 4K screen is connected via DisplayPort and runs at 60Hz, the right 4K screen has to be connected via HDMI which limits its refresh rate to 30Hz. While I personally deem 30Hz to not be sufficient for a main screen, I noticed that for an off-screen it actually is OK. I use it to dump all documents and apps I’m not currently working on, but still need to glance at every now and then. Often the messenger window and Skype land there as well.

So, how does the MacBook Pro 15” cope with pushing that many pixel? Pretty damn well! I actually feared it will come to a crawl when I switched from driving 15 million pixels to almost 22 million, but as a matter of fact, I haven’t noticed any difference in performance for productivity, office and coding tasks.

There is an occasional hiccup, especially when invoking Exposé, but that actually happens occasionally even when I just run the build-in display without external screens. Moving windows, scrolling large documents or website etc. is smooth and even not half-bad on the 30Hz right screen.

Running 4K displays in their native resolution requires good eyesight – not as good as running the build-in display in native 2880×1800, but still. As I often work late at night my eyes are getting tired after 12 or more hours staring at various screens. The first thing I do when I notice my eyes and myself are becoming tired is to switch the build-in display to 1920×1200. The next step is to reduce the resolution on the 4K screens. The next lower resolution is 3008×1692 and I use it on both screens. Oddly enough when I used Samsung’s U28D590D it offered different scaled resolutions when connected via HDMI and mini DisplayPort.

Don’t be afraid of using scaled resolutions on 4K displays – you are unlikely to notice even the tiniest artefacts. It is nothing like setting a different resolution on a Full HD display thanks to the very high pixel density of 4K displays.

HomeOffice_MBP15-2013_3displaysDriving25Kpixels

Another topic of interest are the 4K panels themselves. Displays featuring IPS 4K panels are still quite expensive. The new wave of “cheap” 4K displays that swept the market over the past months all come with TN panels. Usually I would run for the hills at the thought of a TN panel, but a few years back I learned a valuable lesson when it comes to that type of panels.

For years I only used IPS screens due to their superior color reproduction and viewing angles or very little to no color shifting. Then I got my MacBook Air and liked its display a lot. Good colors, great viewing angles – as it supposed to be for an IPS panel. Imagine my surprise when a couple of weeks down the road I learned it’s actually a TN panel that comes in the MacBook Air…

The lesson learned was that IPS panels are better then TN panels, but TN panels are not made equal. There are some really good TN panels where it’s hard to tell them apart from an IPS panel – at least on first sight – and there are TN panels that just make you run screaming.

The TN panel in the Philips 288P is really decent. I have no issues with color shifting or viewing angles despite the display’s large size. That being said, please notice that the right screen is at an angle for better viewing comfort. When you put them side by side in a straight line you are actually able to notice light color shifts when you don’t sit in the middle. Similar situation arises if you sit further away. That however shouldn’t be a problem since you can’t actually work sitting that far away due to the size of elements on the screen. Considering the affordable price of these new 28” 4K TN displays I can only say that they are great for office & productivity work as well as coding. The Philips 288P I can recommend without hesitation. I am also currently evaluating the Samsung U28D590D as well as AOC’s and IIYAMA’s new 28” 4K TN screens. Stay tunes for some thoughts on those displays…

The Curse of Retina

Back in the day when Apple released the iPhone 4 I made my first experience with what I now call ‘The Curse of Retina’. The iPhone 4 was the first iPhone with a retina display. It was crisp, it was detailed, it was amazing. Shorty after I got my iPhone 4 I had the need to use 2 phones for a short period of time. So obviously I used my old iPhone 3G as the second phone and quickly realized how ugly things look on its display after I gotten used to the iPhone 4’s retina display.

Now I am struggling with a serious case of The Curse of Retina. As you might know from a previous post, I use a MacBook Pro 15” with Retina display as my main machine. It’s connected to two 27” DELL displays running at 2560×1440 each and another 24” in portrait mode running at 1080×1920. It’s a great setup I should enjoy a lot, but lately I don’t.

Those DELL displays are top-notch, no question about it. But when I switch between the magnificent retina display on the MacBook Pro and any of the normal displays, I find the lack of “retina crispness” very annoying.

I don’t have a problem working on the iMac, the PC or the Mac Pro that are connected to normal displays, because there I work consistently on the same display quality. On the MacBook Pro however I am looking back and forth between retina and non-retina displays up to 15 times a minute and I find the difference between crisp and not so crisp more and more annoying. As I said before: The Curse of Retina…

One got to love those first world problems, right? I guess there is no other option left for me than go 4K, except the MacBook Pro 15 Late-2013 isn’t able to drive two 4K displays at 60Hz. One 4K at 60Hz and another 4K at 30Hz are possible, but 30Hz are unbearable.

The mouse moves like laced with honey, moving windows around feels extremely sluggish etc. At least that’s what everyone thinks. For most part, they are right. When I got my hands on the first 4k TN display from DELL for a weekend a couple of months back, it did only run at 30Hz and it was bad, really bad.

That being said, I recently hooked up a Samsung 4K display (U28D590) to my MacBook Pro 15” Retina and it did run properly at 60Hz via DisplayPort while also offering a satisfactory experience while connected via HDMI and running at 30Hz. Imagine my surprise.  Yes, things are smoother when running it at 60Hz, but even at 30Hz the mouse did not feel like glued to the desktop and moving things around was fine – not great, but fine. Since I mostly work with lots of documents and massive spreadsheets, the 30Hz experience on the Samsung was absolutely fine for me.

I guess what I’m saying here is: expect yet another change to my setup soon(TM). While at it, I will find out if a 15” MacBook Pro Retina can drive an insane 22 millions pixels…4K here I come!

My Setup (October 2014)

As promised the update to my setup. It now features new gear on the right desk and I managed to find a tiny desk I could squeeze between the two main desks. It adds a very useful “offload” area and I usually keep one of my pet project on there. Currently in the picture it’s the PowerBook G3 FireWire aka PISMO I’m testing with various versions of OS X.

The left desk remains mostly unchanged, except the portrait mode DELL U2311 now made room for the DELL U2414. The resolution remains the same at 1080×1920, but the new one has a much nicer panel and I really like that tiny, slim display border. The U2311 will soon be mounted on the middle desk – a simple monitor stand for it is already in the picture.

The big changes happened on right desk:

MyHomeOffice_Panorama_October_2014

Yes, that’s a 4 display setup consisting of 24” Dell (U2412M) monitors each running at 1920×1200. In addition to my gaming PC there is also a Mac Pro 5.1 now.

A Mid 2010 model with 6-core Xeon @ 3.33 GHz, 16GB RAM, 3x 240GB SDD, 2x 2TB HDD and the ATI 5770 it usually comes with has been replaced by EVGA’s GeForce 680 Mac Edition. I also added a SATA-III controller to provide 6GB/s for the SSDs as well as a dual SDD mount for the lower optical drive bay to accommodate two additional SSDs.

All displays are cross connected to each computer allowing me to use up to 3 of the 4 displays for either the PC or the Mac Pro. Most of the time however I run the setup with the PC using the lower left screen while the Mac Pro uses the upper left screen and both screens on the right.

I am also using the VGA ports of two of the displays to connect them via an adapter to the iMac (which is now on the left side of the desk) and to the tiny Esprimo (which is currently under the desk on a small cabinet).

There is now a simple USB switch mounted to the left monitor to switch the keyboard (Logitech G110) and mouse (Razor DeathAdder) between the PC and the Esprimo. I really need a proper KVM solution here that would allow me to use the gaming input devices with the Mac Pro whenever needed and also connect another Mac mini for testing purposes…

My Setup (September 2014)

I know, I know, I promised some of you months ago I will write about what setup I use at home, what hardware is there and what purpose it serves. Not to mention showing some pictures.

Being urged by a friend I finally decided to do so. Except I ran into a problem right away: I am currently in the process of making some changes to my setup and it’s one bloody mess unsuited for any photos. I did however made some photos of the setup not so long ago for another friend to show and I’ll use that to give you an idea what I work with.

My setup consists of two desks opposite of each other. I admit it is a rather strange way to arrange desks, but there is a good reason for that. It allows me to get less distracted by what is happening on the screens behind me. My work setup is mostly focused on the left desk you see in the picture below. It used to be a MacBook Air 11” connected to a 27” Dell U2713H monitor.  For some months now my work requires a serious amount of screen real-estate and the tiny 11” display of the MBA combined with a 27” display running at 2560×1440 couldn’t cope with it.

MyHomeOffice_LeftDesk_Mid_2014

My new main workhorse these days is a Late 2013 MacBook Pro 15” with Retina display, 16GB RAM, 512GB flash storage and GeForce GT 750M. When at my desk it usually runs in 1920×1200, but every now and then I actually run the display’s native resolution of 2880×1800.  As a matter of fact, I had the native resolution running for most of last week. Let me tell you this: that MBP’s display is just amazing!

When at home, the MBP is connected to two 27” Dell monitors (U2713H and U2713HM), both running at 2560×1440 and one 23” Dell (U2311H) at 1920×1080 that’s always in portrait mode.

That’s right, the MBP runs 3 external monitors on top of its own high-rez display.  It’s driving almost 15 million pixels in this setup and that’s some very serious screen real-estate driven by a slim 2kg notebook!

The MacBook Air is not connected to any external monitor these days and takes the role of a floating companion. I still carry it with me from time to time and use it mostly for communication while having all screens of the MBP occupied with work.

Sound is covered by an Altec Lansing Octane 7 (VS4621) 2.1 speaker system that replaced the Harman Kardon SoundSticks II that went downstairs to the living room . The subwoofer is located on the right side on the bottom of the cabinet. The black cone in the right corner is one of its two speakers. They project the sound downward using the surface they stand on to achieve better sound. As it turned out, they work just short of incredible on IKEA desks as those are sort of hollow inside and thus allow for much better vibrations hence sound than a solid wood desk would. That’s however also the problem with these speakers: they works great on some surfaces and work mediocre at best on others.

On each side of the desk there is a small, open cabinet. They not only make the desk more stable, but also cover some storage needs. The right one holds the subwoofer, a TP-LINK gigabit switch, various external hard drives I like to keep easily accessible and a NAS (Synology DS214se with 2x 4TB WD RED). On top of the cabinet I also keep a Twelve South HiRise I plug my iPhone 5S or iPad mini Retina into.

Speaking of which, the row of green lights with a blue light beneath it in the left cabinet is my main NAS: Synology’s DS412+ with 4x 4TB WD RED HDDs. It runs my main storage, my own little cloud to sync some of my data across all devices and it also runs a Plex server with transcoding to feed us with movies and TV shows.

Unfortunately mostly out of the picture, there is also an AC Time Capsule (3TB) on top of the cabinet. Its purpose are Time Machine backups of all my Macs and to connect the network in my home office with the AC AirPort Extreme downstairs that provides the internet connection (50Mbit downstream, 5Mbit upstream).

My Mid 2011 Mac mini (i5 2.5GHz, 8GB RAM, Radeon 6630M, 600GB Fusion Drive) is next to the Time Capsule and is connected to the left 27” monitor (U2713H). The nice thing about the U2713H are two DisplayPorts so whenever I need the Mac mini I can switch input on the monitor to the other DisplayPort the mini is connected to and then switch back to the DisplayPort that’s hooked up to the MacBook Pro when I’m done. I use the mini very often for testing. As a general rule, I never test stuff on my main workhorse as I need to rely on it being fully functional at any time.

The Mac mini’s keyboard is a Kanex multi-sync keyboard sitting on a retractable keyboard shelf under the desk. The Kanex allows you to connect it to two other Bluetooth devices and even to a forth using USB. I keep if wireless though and out of shit and giggles have it also connected to the iPhone and the iPad.

My Mid 2010 Mac mini (Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz, 8GB RAM, GeForce 320M, 500GB HDD) is downstairs serving as a HTPC connected to the TV in the den (there is also an Apple TV, but I can’t be bothered to make it work with Plex so it’s used for AirPlay only).

Apart of the insane screen real-estate, there is another thing I highly value about this setup: all these devices are virtually silent, even the Network Attached Storages. The only thing that occasionally makes some noise is the MacBook Pro 15” when stressed.

There is also a AMD PC (FX6350 @ 3.9GHz, 16GB RAM, GeForce GTX 460, 120GB SDD + 1TB HDD) under the desk that doesn’t see any use these days as it got replaced by a new one on the other desk.

The other desk. I have to admit it’s a bit less interesting, but that will change shortly when I’m done setting up the new gear.

What you see in the picture is a 21.5” Mid 2011 iMac (i5 2.7GHz, 8GB RAM, Radeon 6770M, 1.2GB Fusion Drive). What you cannot see is a duo of 24” Dell (U2412M) monitors standing next to each other connected to my PC (i5-4670K @ 3.4GHz, 8GB RAM, R9 270X, 120GB SDD + 2TB Hybrid HDD). Both monitors are running at 1920×1200 and in case you don’t feel like doing the math, that’s just 4.1 million pixels combined – which simply pales in comparison to the 15 million pixels on the other desk.

Both monitors serve a double purpose – well, the right one actually serves a triple purpose. The left one is connected to the PC via DVI while also being connected via its VGA port to my Mac mini G4 (PowerPC G4 1.42GHz, 1GB RAM, 120GB HDD).  The right one, apart from being connected via DVI to the PC is also connected via its DisplayPort to the iMac. It is however also connected to a tiny PC (Fujitsu Esprimo Q5030) via its VGA port. If I need to check something on the mini G4 I just switch the left monitor input source to VGA. If I need a second display while working with the iMac, I switch the right monitor to DisplayPort or VGA whenever I need to check up on something on the Esprimo.

The display quality and connectivity of Dell’s UltraSharp line of monitors is why I like them so much. I really love the ability to connect one monitor to different computers as it saves a lot of space on a desk and also ends the hustle of switching cables whenever you need to check something on one of the infrequently used computers. Yes, there are KVM switches for that purpose, but the ones allowing you to run 1920×1200 in good quality more often than not cost more than the computers you are connecting to it. That’s why I went the display input source route. For keyboard and mouse I use a tiny USB switch that switches a Logitech G110 gaming keyboard and a Razor DeathAdder mouse between the PC and the Esprimo. The Mac mini G4 has its own keyboard that’s sitting on a keyboard shelf under the desk while the iMac’s wireless keyboard and mouse are on the desk in front of the iMac.

The PC’s sole purpose is games. That it turns means that lately both 24” monitors spend most of their time being connected to the iMac and the Esprimo.

The job of networking my right desk falls to my previous generation Time Capsule (2TB). Turns out its WAN port can be used as a LAN port after all. For the new setup I will have to deploy  something with more ports, as now there will also be a Mac Pro under that desk and possibly also another MacBook Pro when I find a spot for it…

Well, that’s it for now. I will write another post once the right desk is set up properly. What you can look forward to is a 4 display setup powered by a Mid 2010 Mac Pro and a PC.

Vintage Mac: What Happened?

To start with, let me assure you that I have not given up on this blog. I received a surprising amount of emails asking about when new entries will surface.
The thing is: I have been very busy with work over the past months. So busy in fact, I often lacked the time to unpack and check some of the vintage Macs I bought. Imagine that.

While a mint condition, upgraded G4 Cube still eludes me, I bought some other vintage Macs and even went so far as get some pieces of the pre-PowerPC era: 68k Macs.

To give you an idea (and at the same time safe some effort to not repeat what I got recently to friends over and over again) here is what I acquired in the past months:

Power Macintosh G4 (MDD)
apple_powermac_g4_mddYear: 2002
2x PowerPC 7455 (G4) @ 867Mhz, 768MB RAM, 120GB HDD
The first “Mirrored Drive Doors”. Not the best choice for a vintage Mac to be honest, but at 25,- Euros I will not complain. The reason I actually got it is because I needed a Mac with ADC port – as cheap as possible and ASAP. In preparation for getting a G4 Cube at some point I got myself three Apple Studio Displays (15”, 17” and 20”). Problem however was, I couldn’t test if they actually worked. This Power Mac did the trick and all displays turned out to be in good working condition. Now I know I am ready for a good G4 Cube 😉

 

iMac G3/500 (indigo)

apple_imac_500_indigo2Year: 2001
PowerPC 750cx (G3) @ 500MHz, 1GB RAM, 40GB HDD, 14” up to 1024×768 built-in CRT
Another cheap buy. I didn’t even intend to get one of the original iMacs, but who could say no to one that’s actually in good shape at 15,- Euros including shipping?
The funny thing about those “second generation” iMacs (slot loading optical drives) is that they don’t use fans and rely solely on convection cooling. This in turn means that they run absolutely silent – if it weren’t for the HDD that in those days was loud, really loud or defeating, dependent on the model…

 

iMac G3/350 (blueberry)

apple_imac_350Year: 1999
PowerPC 750 (G3) @ 350MHz, 320MB RAM, 6GB HDD, 14” up to 1024×768 built-in CRT
Yet another cheap buy and again one I didn’t initially intend to get. But it was being sold locally for 12 Euros so I picked it up on my way from work. The AirPort card inside is worth that much on its own and I bought it for that card and its adapter board.

 

iBook Clamshell (indigo)

apple_ibook_indigoYear: 2000
PowerPC 750cx @ 366 MHz, 12.1” 800×600 color display, first iBook with FireWire
I actually got two of those, both in really good condition with the second one intended for spare parts when the time comes. Quite honestly I find them rather ugly, but since I got both for cheap I figured I’d go for it anyway.

 

 

 

PowerBook G3 FireWire aka PISMO

apple_powerbook_g3_fw_PISMOYear: 2000
PowerPC 750 (G3) @ 400MHz, 768MB RAM, 40GB HDD, 14.1” 1024×768 color display
That’s a real classic right there and after playing with it for a bit I can see why. Easy to take apart and fix, the most expandable notebook Apple ever produced and a keyboard that’s just a dream to type on. This one is actually likely to get some real use due to that keyboard alone. The one I got is in close to mint condition – a real collectable.

 

Power Macintosh 7100/80 & 7100/80AV
apple_powermac_7100Year: 1995
PowerPC 601 @ 80 MHz, 136 MB RAM, 700MB HDD
Never liked those rather ugly, large desktops, but they are really good machines and being able to run a wide selection of Mac OS versions I decided to get one. They are also great as a gateway to transfer files to and from older Macs, be it via floppies or network.
The 7100/80AV I got together with the Macintosh Classic since they were sold together months after I already had the 7100/80.

Power Macintosh 6100/60 & Houdini
Power Mac 6100Year: 1994
PowerPC 601 @ 60 MHz, 16 MB RAM, 250MB HDD
I didn’t really intended to buy this one as I feel that area is nicely covered with the 7100/80, but Houdini did it! Houdini is an expansion card Apple released for this Mac that hosts basically a whole 486 PC sans ports (except display) and storage. It even has a SoundBlaster and its own RAM. This means that you can run Mac OS and Windows 95 or 98 simultaneously and switch between the two operating systems with a key combination. Actually, you can connect a second monitor to the Houdini’s display port. Since the Houdini is basically a PC on a card, Windows runs parallel to Mac OS. Obviously I had to have this one and compared to most of the Macs I bought over the past months this one was rather pricey even though it needs some work to fix it up.

 

PowerBook Duo 270c (incl. all accessories)
apple_powerbook_duo270c Year: 1993
68030 @ 33 MHz, 12MB, 240MB HDD, 8.4” 640×400 color display.
There was a time in early 1994 where I actually looked at a Mac and it was the 270c. I needed a new notebook, something small and light. On the other hand I wanted something with some power and expandability when at home. The PowerBook Duo line has large docking stations where the notebook mechanically slid in (like a VHS tape) and the docking station offered all the connectivity one needed + additional video RAM and 2 expansion slots for card. But back then I decided to go once again with an IBM ThinkPad. Today I wish I went with the 270c and thus got into Macs earlier…

 

Macintosh LC II
apple_mac_lc_iiYear: 1992
68030 @ 16 MHz, 4MB RAM, 120MB HDD
The awesome “pizza box” form factor. Came with a fitting Apple 13” color monitor with one of those half-flat SONY Triniton CRTs. It really looks nice being that slim with that tiny screen on top of it. It does however seem to need some serious work to make it run as it sometimes boots and sometimes doesn’t. I am already looking forward to fix this little guy.

 

Macintosh Quadra 700
apple_quadra_700Year: 1991
68040 @ 25MHz, 20MB RAM, 160MB HDD
I remember this one from when I was young. The Apple reseller I passed on my way to university had it on display boasting about how incredible fast it was. I also admit I really like the case and the rather small size. One of the first Macs to come with build-in AAUI to connect it to a “proper” network. This one is in dire need of HDD replacement. While the Quantum ProDrive inside works well, it produces a noise level beyond bearable. That being said, you wouldn’t believe how hard it is to get a decent 3.5” SCSI HDD these days…

 

Macintosh IIsi
IIsiYear: 1990
68030 @ 20 MHz, 4MB RAM, 80MB HDD
This one will need some work, but I do like the slim look of it. I also came with an Apple 13” color CRT. Looking forward to fix it up and do some upgrades. I actually managed to get my hands on a replacement case for it that didn’t yellowed from old age. Like the LC II it would fit perfectly onto the keyboard tray below my desk I don’t use and connected to a beige NEC 20” IPS screen it would feel just at home. That’s the reason the slim form factor Macs stand a good chance to be fixed, upgraded and put into some use soon.

 

Macintosh Classic
apple_mac_classicYear: 1990
68000 @ 8 MHz, 4MB RAM, 40MB HDD
It doesn’t get any more classic than a Classic. Well, except maybe Classic II, Color Classic or a Color Classic II. I would love to have a Color Classic II, but so far I haven’t come across one that’s in good shape at a good price. This Classic on the other hand is in great condition and came at 95 Euros including the 7100/80AV mentioned earlier. Most important though: it is just so cute. You can place it anywhere in the house and your girlfriend or wife won’t object.

 

Since I didn’t have time to make photos on my own, I used pictures of these Macs from EveryMac.com – pretty much the best place to look up detailed specs of all Macs and compare Mac specs with each other.

Along the journey of buying all those Macs I also got a lot of other devices to complement them or in some cases to actually be able to do anything with some the older models. Among those things are:

  • Iomega ZIP drives (LPT for PC and SCSI for Macs) and some ZIP disks.
  • Apple 1.1GB external SCSI HDD (M2115).
  • Multiple AAUI and PhoneNet adapters for networking Macs.
  • AppleCD 150 external SCSI CD-ROM.
  • HDI-SCSI adapter for old PowerBooks.
  • VideoLogic DVA-400 NuBus graphics card
  • VGA converters to connect those old Macs to a “modern” NEC 20” IPS MultiSync display.
  • Various HDI display adapters for old desktops and notebooks as some don’t have the Apple 15-pin video port relaying solely on the HDI port for connecting displays.
  • Griffin FireWave external FireWire sound card.
  • Lots of new batteries for the notebooks. My gut-feeling tells me we won’t be able to buy them soon.
  • Something I never though I would buy ever again: 10 packs of floppy disks…

The odd thing is, that most of those devices cost significantly more these days than the Macs above. A DOS Compatibility Card aka Houdini or an original Apple external HDD cost easily 100,- Euros or more these days!

As you can see from the list above, 13 Macs joined the ranks of my small vintage Mac collection. I plan to put them to some use, set them up in a network and so on. Plenty to write about over the next couple of months provided I manage to find the time.

There have also been massive changes to my modern setups, but more about that in a few days.

Vintage Mac: Software & Abandonware

Abandonware_Logo_1_small

Finding software for a vintage Mac is quite an undertaking. This starts with the operating system itself. Apple obviously doesn’t sell those outdated operating systems anymore. What you are left with are specialized dealers, craiglist or eBay. If you look at the prices at some good dealers like LowEndMac or Hardcoremac.com you’ll notice that we are talking serious money here. For popular PowerPC operating systems such as OS X Tiger or especially Leopard (the last OS X capable of running on PowerPC Macs) you are often looking at price tags above $200 or even $250. That in my personal opinion is just too much for an obsolete operating system, especially if you consider that unlike a PC, your old Mac initially came with an operating system that was included in its price.

If you are like me, you are left with eBay and Craiglist or their local equivalents in your country. That doesn’t mean you get your retail version of OS X or Mac OS there for cheap, but sometimes you can spot auctions or ads for far more reasonable prices like $50 or sometimes even less. You just have to spend a couple of weeks looking for a good find.

You also have to pay attention to what you are looking for. In general Apple operating systems are being offered as retail version, but also on gray disks that initially came with a Mac. These gray installation disks however do work with only a very limited selection of Macs, usually the ones they came with and maybe, just maybe and occasionally, other Macs from the same period.

I got myself OS X Leopard and Tiger (both retail) for $35 and $28 respectively, but it took close to 3 months to find them at these prices. I also snatched an old Mac OS 9 retail CD (unfortunately without the box) for mere $10 at a local store dealing in computer repairs and second hand hardware. Having both OS X Tiger and Mac OS 9 I felt I’m being covered in terms of my iMac G4. Wrong.

As it turned out, the Mac OS 9 (9.2.1) retail disk is basically too old for the iMac G4. It does boot, it even starts to launch Mac OS 9, but then the screen goes black and that’s it. Looks a lot like an issue with graphics drivers. What I would need is the original Mac OS 9 installation/restore disk that came with the iMac G4. Except I find it close to impossible to get one of those. Nobody seems to sell them and if they do, they are usually from a much never iMac G4.

If you think going to a forum and ask for help would be a good idea at this point, you are quite mistaken. I did spent some time looking into the problem and reading several related posts on various forums and what I usually found was: whenever someone came up with a problem like that rather than getting offered an image of a disk that would solve the problem he got told off followed by multiple posters telling in harsh words to not pirate software.

I am against software piracy even more than the next guy (I do make my living from creating software), but at least some common sense should be applied. Apple declared these operating systems obsolete, unsupported and doesn’t sell them anymore. At this point what I would expect is being able to download restoration disks for obsolete Macs in the support section. Unlike Windows, Mac OS and OS X are bound to Mac hardware and that’s where Apple makes its money.

What I am left with at this point with my Mac OS 9 installation is turning to torrents and hopefully find the disk I need there. Do I feel bad about? Not even a tiny bit, especially since I actually own a retail version of Mac OS 9.

This brings me to another issue. I would love to try OS X Panther, Cheetah or Jaguar on my iMac G4 just to see how they looked and felt. I do however consider paying upwards of $300 for those systems and especially for that purpose madness. Unlike OS X Tiger or Leopard, the older versions of OS X rarely show up in classifieds or on auctions. And the situation gets even worse when it comes to old software. Check eBay for very popular software like let’s say Office 2001. As I am writing this, eBay.co.uk has tons of books for Microsoft Office 2001, but the only software is an Office 2001 update CD. Finding software that is more rare than Office or games is an exercise in futility. I should know as I am trying for a couple of months now.

This is where abandonware comes in. While from a legal standpoint it’s a gray area at best, when one applies common sense to the issue it is the only viable approach available today.

I love abandonware and have been a big fan of sites offering old software and games to download. As a matter of fact, I was also professionally grateful for the service these sites provide whenever I needed to look at some of the software or games I did in the past. Even if I would find the original game somewhere in storage at the office I would still have to battle the stupid copy protection we shipped our games with. Considering I don’t have an optical drive in any of my notebooks for at least 5 years now, that would be a serious problem on its own.

The company I work at and that I am a majority owner of does not care about our old games or software. We don’t sell then, we don’t support them and many people in the team don’t even remember those products anymore. If there are sites that make those products available to fans, then we are glad about it. If there are gamers or users out there who can enjoy our old work, the better. Should we want to use one of those brands to release a sequel, we can just write those sites to take the old products down and from experience from another company I worked for I know they do it quite promptly. Everyone is happy.

Out of curiosity, over the past couple of years I asked a lot of friends in the gaming industry about their opinion on abandonware. To my surprise, most just didn’t give a damn about the subject. Some were fans of it like I am. Few didn’t like the idea, but couldn’t be bothered to do anything about it either. Very few were really glad those sites exists, because their company does not have the one or other game anymore. They never bothered to transfer their products to new storage medias and put them into their backups. These games would otherwise be lost forever.

With more and more companies taking their old games and developing remakes for mobile (iOS and Android), the situation in terms of abandonware might see a change in the future. Until this happens though, let’s just enjoy it.

Just google mac abandonware and you’ll find the major sites on the first result page.

If you have been using computers for a couple of decades or even longer, you are likely to re-discover software and games you used and played in the past. Chances are you payed for many of the ones you downloading today in your past. I know I do.

I slowly start to seriously regret junking my large game collection a decade ago when I moved from one country to another. I do believe games with their original disks and boxes will become proper collector items within the next decade. Maybe not as large as comics are today, but what comics were for the last generation, computer games are for the current one. On the other hand half of my games back then were already so old, the diskettes could not be read reliable anymore. I did keep the boxes in good condition though…

My favorite site for mac software is Macintosh Garden. When it comes to old games, I usually look at My Abandonware and play those oldies on my modern Macs using Boxer. It is basically a Mac port of DOSBox wrapped into a beautifully made user interface making setting those games up and running them incredibly simple.

Now, some very popular oldies cannot be found on abandonware sites anymore, because they again can be bought. You can find them on Steam occasionally, but there is one site you want to put into your bookmarks: gog.com. What those guys do is they license old games, remove copy protections making these games DRM free and modify them to run on recent computers. Then they sell them at bargain prices, usually only for a couple of bucks. Like Steam, they often have great special offers. They currently offer more than 600 games for PC, but their Mac games section is growing nicely, too.

Vintage Mac: A Time Before Computers

A_Time_Before_Computers

I stumbled across an interesting tidbit I find quite amusing when you consider how the jargon has changed over the last couple of decades:

  • An application was for employment
  • A program was a TV show
  • A hard drive was a long trip on the road
  • A cursor used profanity
  • A keyboard was a piano
  • A web was a spider’s home
  • A virus was the flu
  • A CD was a bank account
  • A mouse was a rodent
  • Memory was something you lost with age

Vintage Mac: PowerBook G4

PowerBook_G5_15_mineFor some reason, when thinking about good candidates for a vintage Mac I focused on desktops and forgot about notebooks. The PowerBooks G4 are actually quite interesting in that regard, especially the earlier ones made out of Titanium. Titanium, ‘nuff said. How cool is that? I started looking into titanium PowerBooks in the summer, but these machines are quite difficult to get these days. As it seems, titanium isn’t the best material to make notebooks out of after all. Finding a titanium PowerBook without major scratches, dents all over the place and especially those ugly paint scrapes is quite a challenge. One that I failed at miserably.

While looking for a titanium PowerBook G4 I came across an auction for an aluminum 15” PowerBook G4 1.67 GHz, mint condition, in perfect shape including the original box and all  that it originally came with. I wanted it, I really did. It just made a great collector’s item. Unfortunately the auction spinned out of control and ended at almost $1000. That’s just way too much for me as a hobby, not to mention you can get a new MacBook for that kind of money.

Participating in that auction did have some consequences: now I wanted a PowerBook G4 15” or 17”, preferably one of the last models from 2005 with 1.67GHz. I figured getting one in a non-mint condition, but cheap, would be quite a good idea (no, this is not the place to discuss my sanity…or rather lack thereof). I want the display to be in great condition, I want the body to be in good shape without dents, but I don’t mind a minor scratch here and there, especially on the bottom. I want the keyboard and its background lighting to be in good condition as well.

Other than that I don’t really care much for the rest like installation disks, manuals, original power supply or state of the battery. As long as I can get it cheap.

Two weeks ago I found one on Allegro, the polish equivalent of eBay. 15” PowerBook G4 1.67 GHz, 1GB RAM, 80GB HDD. It looked good on the photos, only some minor scratches. The battery reached its end of life a couple of years ago, but it had a new power supply. The optical drive was dead, but the keyboard was in great condition even though it had a very odd layout I have never seen before. The display was in perfect condition as well and the display hinges were in pretty good shape, too. I went for it and 5 days later it was mine for not even 100 bucks including shipping.

It came with OS X Tiger (10.4.11) installed, but no installation disks. After having played around a bit with a Mac mini G4 (1.42 GHz and 1GB RAM) with Tiger I figured the PowerBook G4 will be slightly faster, but nothing really noticeable. Boy was I wrong. That thing screams. It’s fast, responsive, boots in a portion of time the Mac mini G4 boots and the keyboard is superb.

I plan to get OS X Leopard installed on it and use for my “research” into how useful a PowerPC Mac is these days for the daily tasks an average user does. Now I am off to find a working optical drive, 2GB of RAM and grab my OS X Leopard disk for it.

Vintage Mac: My iMac G4

iMac_G4_motionAs you might know from my previous posts, I am looking for some vintage Macs. The iMac G4 was obviously on my list as was the PowerMac G4 Cube. The Cube is still eluding me, but an iMac G4 is quite easy to come by. Except when you look for a specific model like I do.

I assume it will take me quite a while to find a G4 Cube in excellent condition so I figured I grab an iMac G4 that is also capable of booting into Mac OS9, a task previously intended for the G4 Cube. Every iMac G4 can run Mac OS 9 in OS X’s Classic Environment. Basically Mac OS 9 gets loaded within OS X (up to and including OS X 10.4 “Tiger”) allowing you to run Mac OS 9 application within OS X, but some applications and especially games have problems with that approach. That’s why I wanted the real deal where the Mac boots Mac OS 9 rather than launching it within OS X. The first iMac G4 can do that, but I wanted one with a 17” display. Here things got a bit more tricky.

Apple introduced the iMac G4 in January 2002. Initially there were 2 models to choose from, both with 15” displays and the cheaper one with a 700MHz CPU while the more expensive one featured a 800MHz CPU and larger HDD. In July the same year Apple added a 17” iMac G4 to the lineup featuring a 800MHz CPU and a GeForce MX4 rather than the GeForce MX2 in the 15” models. This 17” iMac G4 (M8812LL) is capable to run OS X and also able to boot into MacOS 9.

However, in February 2003 Apple replaced the 17” iMac G4 / 800MHz with another 17” iMac G4 / 800MHz (M9105LL). On the hardware side it stayed pretty much the same, but this newer iMac G4/800 cannot boot into Mac OS 9 anymore. Looking for a used one more than a decade later makes it quite tiresome to find the right model when people usually announce their iMacs with CPU speed and display size only.

What Did I Get?

It took me a while to find “my” iMac G4 in a decent condition where the optical drive and the HDD work, the display arm is still firm, the display doesn’t have any scratches or bad pixels and the white of the body is still at least white-ish. I got mine dirt-cheap in a really decent condition. It came without anything except 2 installations disks (out of the 6 it originally came with) which were also really badly scratched and un-usuable in any of the drives I tried them with. Heck, it didn’t even come with a power cord. Thankfully the power cord is the same power cord that goes into the power supply of the old Mac mini so I used that one. Finding a power cord like this somewhere to buy is a lot more difficult that one might think, at least in Europe.

That’s what 80 Euros including shipping got me. Missing a keyboard and mouse is not a problem as any USB keyboard and mouse will do. Apple input devices from that era are usually very cheap, too – if you want to go for the original look.

AppleProKeyboard_mineI got the keyboard (Apple Pro Keyboard) and mouse (Apple Pro Mouse) for it on eBay as there are plenty to choose from. Just to make things a little harder, Apple decided to rename both the keyboard and the mouse some years later to Apple Keyboard and Apple Mouse loosing the “Pro” moniker. That being said, every USB keyboard or mouse will work if you don’t care about “original” condition. And unless you are anal about it, you really shouldn’t. While the keyboard is pretty nice to work with, the Apple Pro Mouse is just awful.

AppleProMouse_MightMouseYes, it’s an optical mouse and works quite well and accurate on all common surfaces, but the whole mouse is basically the mouse button. The lack of left and right mouse button is really unintuitive these days and what’s even worse is the is the absence of any scrolling input. Do yourself a favor and get its successor: Apple’s Might Mouse. While it might not be the best mouse around, it is still very usable from today’s point of view. That being said, don’t buy the wireless Might Mouse like I did. It is just too heavy for comfortable use. The wired model feels so much better and since the keyboard offers two USB ports, you can keep the amount of wires running across your desk at bay.

AppleProSpeakersI also managed to find Apple Pro Speakers on eBay. Some of the more expensive iMac G4s came with those speakers that are pretty darn good for their size. They aren’t really necessary as the iMac G4 has built-in speakers, but due to the size restrains in its body they are mediocre at best. Not to mention the Pro Speakers have quite an unique look. However, you pay for the look with cash as they aren’t cheap these days and they come with a proprietary mini plug rather than the standard headphone jack.

What Do I Need?

I need to get more RAM for this iMac G4. It currently has 512MB and that isn’t enough for OS X Tiger. Yes, Tiger runs quite OK on those 512MB, but an application here and there and a couple of tabs in the browser and it begins to crawl. Unlike other Macs, upgrading to the maximum amount of supported memory on the iMac G4 is tricky. It has two memory slots and that’s where the fun begins. One of these slots is a standard notebook 144-pin SO-DIMM and takes a PC133 memory module with up to 512MB RAM. This memory slot is considered by Apple “user accessible” and you only need to unscrew 4 screws at the bottom of the base to get to it.

The other slot is a standard desktop one: 168-pin DIMM, again PC133 memory up to 512MB RAM. This one however is not easily accessible as it’s located in the upper part of the body and that means taking the entire iMac G4 apart to get to it.

I really don’t feel like taking the whole thing apart just now, so I plan to get a 512MB SO-DIMM and upgrade the memory to 768MB and see it that’s enough. I know Tiger runs really nicely on a PowerBook G4 (yes, I got myself one, but that’s a story for another post) with 1GB RAM, so I hope that 768MB RAM will be close to that experience.

What Do I Do With It?

Well, first I am going to reinstall OS X and then get Mac OS 9 on it. When I get my hands on OS X version before Tiger I plan to install those too to see how OS X evolved over time.  Considering the availability and prices this might take a while though.

I expect to spend most of my time on this iMac G4 with Mac OS 9, old games and apps. I was very eager to see how useful a PowerPC Mac can still be these days (or not), but I will use the PowerBook G4 for that purpose.

Without tricks the last OS X that can be installed on this iMac G4 is OS X Tiger (10.4.11). With tricks you can install OS X Leopard (10.5.8) on it, but due to the slow CPU and the amount of RAM it’s not really a good idea. From my experience so far and from what I have been reading you want at least 1.5GB RAM for Leopard. You want 1GB RAM for Tiger and that’s the maximum these older iMacs G4 can be upgraded to (newer iMac G4 models are capable of being upgraded to 2GB RAM).

So I will leave PowerPC viability in 2013/2014 to the PowerBook G4 while focusing on the past and especially Mac OS 9 on this iMac G4. Expect some posts in a month or so on that subject – possibly even earlier since I just won an auction for a copy of Mac OS 9 Retail earlier today 🙂

PC to Mac: Using Finder Effectively

The Finder is OS X’s central piece as much as the Explorer is in Windows. While I prefer Norton Commander style side by side file managers, I often used the Explorer in Windows and now am using the Finder whenever heavy editing or copying/moving of files isn’t involved. The Finder, like the Windows Explorer, is far from a perfect tool, but it can actually become a lot better when used correctly, when you apply some tricks and set preferences the right way.

As a Windows user, chances are that when you look at Finder, you are likely to see a Windows Explorer, just looking a bit different. I know I did. In turns out, the Finder is actually quite capable with lots of nifty functionality that you just don’t see at first. Once someone tells you that it’s there, you might actually start to consider using Finder as your primary file manager.

Before we start, here are some keys for you. The most important thing to know is that OS X uses where you would use CTRL in Windows. Copy, Paste, Cut, Undo, Redo etc. So it’s and C or and V instead of CTRL and C or CTRL and V.

Alt key also referred to as ‘option’.

Control also often shortened as CTRL.

Command also often shortened as CMD or occasionally referred to as Apple key as older keyboards labeled it with the Apple logo instead of the command symbol .

Show Sidebar and Status Bar

Finder_ViewSidebarThe first thing you want to do is enable some options to show certain elements that are hidden by default: Sidebar, Status Bar and Path Bar. Open the ‘View’ menu and enable all three.

The Sidebar allows you to quickly switch between the most important folders, drivers etc. While at it, open the Finder’s preferences and switch to the ‘Sidebar’ tab to check all the elements you want the Finder to show on the Sidebar. Unlike Windows Explorer, the Sidebar does not allow you to expand selections nor is it a tree view.  That’s where the Finder’s column view comes in, but more about that later.

You can easily add items to the Sidebar by selecting the item you want to add and pressing and T or using ‘Add To Sidebar’ from the Finder’s ‘File’ menu.

Finder_StatusBarThe Status Bar at the bottom of the Finder window will show you how many items are in the current folder and how much space is left on the drive. I personally find the free space information very useful when working with different drives. What is even more important, the Status Bar shows a slider on the right side allowing you to quickly change the size of icons when in icon view. Very handy when viewing folders containing graphical files or photos.

Harness the power of the Path Bar

Finder_PathBarThe Path Bar shows you where you are. If you are deep into a folder structure or just use a small Finder window, the folders in the Path Bar will automatically collapse. Hovering with your mouse over the collapsed folders will display their full name. While this is quite nice, it’s nothing to be really excited about, except that the Path Bar can do so much more. It is in fact an interactive element that can be used for navigation and file management.

By double clicking any folder on the Path Bar your Finder will switch to that folder. Double clicking a folder while holding will open that folder in a separate Finder window thus allowing you quickly and easily operate on two windows when copying or moving files when you need it.

You can also drag files directly onto a folder in the Path Bar to move them into that folder or drag them while holding the alt key to copy them to that folder. This is quite a powerful functionality that can save you a lot of time you would otherwise spend by opening and navigating new Finder windows.

Show Item Info

Finder_ItemInfoAnother useful option you want to enable is ‘Show item info’ that you’ll find by switching to icon view and using ‘Show view options’ in Finder’s ‘View’ menu. I suggest you set it as default. What it will do is show additional information to any file based on the type of file. For example for graphics files you will see their resolution, for movies their duration and for folders it will show you how many items they contain.

Use the right view for the right content

Finder_ShowAsWhen working with the Finder it is important to use the right view for the right content. Finder allows you to quickly switch between Icon, List, Column and Cover Flow using either the icon on the toolbar or pressing and 1, 2, 3 or 4.

When you browse pictures, photos or video files, the icon view is a good choice, although Cover Flow might be a good fit as well, depending on the type of the pictures or videos you are browsing. When using Cover Flow, you can easily change the size of the cover flow element by simply grabbing the graphical area at the lower part and moving your mouse up and town to decrease and increase its size.

When managing files where file sizes, dates of creation etc. are of importance, the list view often is the best choice, same as in Windows Explorer.

When you need to get to some place deep in the folder structure or do something you would normally have done by expanding items in the Windows Explorer’s tree view, your best bet is Finder’s column view.

Arrange & Sorting

Finder_ArrangeThis one fits very nicely with the views. If you need to “sort” your files by size, date etc., you can do it the same way as you did in Windows Explorer by clicking the appropriate column once or twice to show you the files in ascending or descending order respectively.

However, when you are in a different view than list view, you can still arrange your files. Sure, Windows Explorer can do in other views than detailed view by now, but it just doesn’t tell you anything. Finder on the other hand provides you with meaningful separators so that you actually get an idea about file size range or how old the files are.

Finder_Arrange_2On top of that, when there are a lot of files within one separator, the Finder switches that separator into a cover flow type view and that way keeps things very tidy without the need to scroll and scroll. If you need to see all those cover flown items at once, simply click on ‘Show All’ on the right hand side of that separator.

The combination of arranging and sorting files used together allows for a great overview in certain situation when dealing with extensive file libraries. Not a feature or rather combination of features most users will use often, but it is worthwhile to know that it is there and that Arrange By and Sort By can be combined.

Navigating files & folders

You opened Finder, selected a file and pressed Enter, didn’t you? Yes, it does rename the file. No, it does not open the file. It is just annoying when such basic functionality is handled differently between major operating systems. Finder expects you to press and O to open the file. Same when you want to enter a folder. However, don’t familiarize yourself with and O. Use and cursor down instead. It does the same thing, but when you familiarize yourself with that one, you can use and cursor up to leave the folder and that will feel more intuitive then.

When you are in list view, you can also use cursor left and cursor right to expand and collapse folders.

Windows Explorer’s Enter and Backspace to accomplish the same things and F2 to rename an item are a lot quicker, but it is what it is. Finder tries to make up for that annoyance with spring-loaded folders, though.

While on the subject of doing things differently, you might not have a Del key on your Mac’s keyboard. If you wonder how to quickly delete a file, the answer is: and backspace.

That being said, when you get used to the way OS X opens file/folders, it isn’t bad. When you are a keyboard person and you use cursor keys to navigate through your files, you’ll notice that using with cursor down to open a file or enter a folder and with cursor up to leave it actually is quite quick and intuitive. Combine that with fn and cursor up or cursor down for Page Up or Page Down and spacebar for preview and you find yourself navigating through your files with minimal movement of your hands. When you get back to Windows after a while, you will be annoyed about F2 and PgUp/PgDn being so far away. Go figure.

Spring-loaded folders

When you copy files from one place to another, you can copy them via and C, navigate to the place you want to copy them to and paste them via and V. That’s OK, but you can’t do that when you want to move files, as Cut is not available and pressing and X will just result in an error beep. You can of cause open a second Finder window. Let’s face it, when copying and moving files around with Windows Explorer, we are all used to have multiple windows open.

Finder offers an alternative approach called spring-loaded folders. When you drag a file onto a folder and pause for a moment, the folder springs open. It’s quick and intuitive.

If you are copying or moving files through several folders, that moment you pause over a folder to have it spring open can get annoying, though. You can make the folder open instantly by pressing spacebar when you have your files over the folder.

Finder_Spring-Loaded_FoldersYou can also set the delay for sprint-loaded folders in the Finder’s preferences in the ‘General’ tab using the slider at the bottom. Hint: to move a file rather than copy it, hold while dragging the file. The Command key modifies the Finder’s behavior from copy to move.

Get Info a.k.a. “Properties”

In Windows Explorer you used Alt and Enter to invoke an item’s properties to get detailed information about that file or folder. The Finder’s equivalent is Get Info and you invoke it by pressing and I. Unfortunately the Get Info window doesn’t close by simply pressing ESC like Windows’ properties do. You have to press and W, which is quite annoying and Windows clearly solved it better. What OS X does better is allowing you to have it open at all times, by pressing and and I. Alternatively use the Finder’s ‘File’ menu and hold down the alt key () to have ‘Get Info’ change to ‘Show Inspector’.

You get the “properties” window that will show information for every file you select allowing you to browse files while having their detailed information displayed instantly in a separate window.

Copy path to clipboard

Want to copy the current path to the clipboard to send it to a friend to tell him where he or she can find the file on their Mac? There is no easy way like in Windows Explorer where you just mark the path and press CTRL C.

In Finder you have to either use Item Info and mark the path there or open Terminal and drag the file or folder into the terminal window. That will display the full path in the command line and you can select it with your mouse and use and C to copy it to the clipboard and then paste it into your app with and V. You can also do it with a TextEdit document instead of Terminal, but you need to switch the document to plain text via ‘Make Plain Text’ from the ‘Format’ menu.

Quick Look

There is one key you want yourself to familiarize with: the spacebar. It is the default shortcut for Quick Look, OS X’s powerful preview. It will preview most of the common file formats, is very quick and you close it quickly by either hitting spacebar again or using ESC. To preview another file in the same folder, you don’t even have to close Quick Look, you can just navigate to the next file using the cursor keys. Really great for viewing files file by file while in list view.

Quick Look is quite powerful and depending on content allows you to do some interesting things, like showing page thumbnails when viewing PDF documents or scrolling through texts. When you select multiple files (such as pictures or movies), it will show you a grid icon that allows you to preview all of them.

Need to know how much space that folder occupies? Select it and press spacebar.

Using spacebar together with the alt key () will launch Quick Look in full screen mode. You can also switch it to full screen mode by using the full screen icon in the upper right corner of the Quick Look window or by using the pinch-out gesture on your trackpad.

Should Quick Look not be able to preview some of your files, just have a look for the right plugin on the net or try www.quicklookplugins.com or http://qlplugins.com.

Toolbar Tricks

Finder_ToolbarLike most apps, Finder allows you to customize its toolbar via ‘Customize Toolbar…’ in the ‘View’ menu. I personally find it very useful to put New Folder and Get Info onto the toolbar.

If you look at the picture of my toolbar, you’ll notice a colorful icon left of the search field. That’s SimplyRAR’s icon, an app to handle RAR files. You can simply drag any app from your Applications folder onto the toolbar and launch it by just clicking on its icon. I find it very useful for apps I use a lot when dealing with files.

To remove an app from the toolbar, you have to use ‘Customize Toolbar…’ and drag the app outside the Finder window.

Finder_ToolBarFolderApps are not the only thing you can put onto your Finder’s toolbar. You can for example drag folders there, too. This way you can have the places you use very often in your toolbar. Simply navigate to the folder you want and drag its icon from the title bar onto the toolbar. That’s it.

Use Labels

Finder_LabelsLabels allow you to mark files or folders with colors. You can for example mark important files to have them stand out from the rest of the files. Or you can mark frequently used places with colors. Marking folders with work or school related items and private items is another fine application of labels. The important thing however is, to not overuse labels. If you label most of your files and folders, you won’t do yourself any favors. Labels are best used rarely.

Finder_Labels2To label a file simply select a color under Labels in the Finder’s ‘File’ menu or right-click the file and use a color from the context menu. To remove a label from an item, select the X instead of a color.

You can change the label for each color in Finder’s preferences in the ‘Labels’ tab to fit your own preferences, i.e. change ‘red’ to ‘Important’.

Labels can be very useful, but it is the next version of OS X, 10.9 a.k.a. Mavericks, where they should shine. Mavericks will feature a redesign of labels and allow you tagging of files. What this means is you being able to use tags like you see on blogs for your files making searches much easier and less cumbersome.

Final Words

While the Finder might not be the perfect file manager, it is by far more capable than many users who switch from Windows think. Considering the changes to Finder we will see soon with OS X 10.9 Mavericks it will even get better, especially when it finally supports tabs. I admit I was quite surprised how good Finder is and find myself using Finder more and more while I use Disk Order  less and less.